India and NigeriaBoth India and Nigeria were colonized by the British , and are characterized by extremedivisions in spite of appearance the res publica . Yet , India has been more successful than Nigeria indemocratization , because of a alter of resolvesOne of the main reasons for success of democracy in India , is its constitution . every(prenominal) make do isbeing taken to ensure that no world index number is magisterial . All authorities are answerable to some pledge . Power is divided between the Prime Minister , who is the Legislative head of thecountry and the chairperson , who is the constitutional head of the country . Both are answerable toeach other . Except the President , there is no authority which has a secured time frame . Thisensures that any pillowcase of autarchy is never born , and if at all it i s born , it is neer nurtured . IndiraGandhi tried to become autocratic , and she was thrown out of power by the hatful . The choicecommission in India is an autonomous body , and so free and fair elections are a reality inIndia . This is non confessedly of Nigeria . Her constitution has no checks for growth of any type ofautocracyAnother reason is that liberty in India was a result of massive alter of thepeople , led by attractions like Mahatma Gandhi , who never wanted any power Selfless service wasvery much(prenominal) in course in India .
This was completely absent in Nigeria There were no semi gover nmentalleaders to induce the spirit of self ! trust in the people of NigeriaIndia had only one very powerful national political party , the Indian National sexual relation , for legion(predicate) decades since its Independence . This fact , coupled with a very bulletproof leader like Nehruensured a stable governance to the country . Nehru was re-re elected the Prime Minister of Indiafor almost 14 old succession . Stability of government ensured a very firm subside word for democracy toflourish in India . This was not the case with Nigeria . It had many political parties (History ofNigeria ) which were eager for development of their own groups only Selfishness prevailedamongst the leaders , and they were not ready to take accept defeats (Kurlantizick JoshuaThis gave a gruelling pouffe to the democratic dreams of its massesReferences1 . History of Nigeria , wikipedia the free encyclopedia , 21 July 07Retrieved on 27 July 07 fromp 2 . Kurlantizick Joshua , Nigeria s disastrous presidential election Failed state5 Februar y 07 , Retrieved on 27 July 07 fromp PAGEPAGE 3...If you want to get a rich essay, redact it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment