Article Critique Genetically Modified Food Essay

The article by Amin, Jahi and Nor was conducted in Malaysia to find out the stakeholders military strength to genetic onlyy modified viandss and medicine (1). In particular, the investigators were interested to know the positioning towards GM insulin/medicine, GM palm anele and GM soybean. They designed the hear as a resume with 1017 respondents. They found that the Malayan stakeholders are conservative about the genetically modified foods. They agreed that genetically modified foods set out savvyd benefits but at the same time they were concerned about the honorable aspects and risks associated with the GM Foods.A closer analysis revea guide difference stakeholders attitudes towards GM foods. Title The title stakeholders attitude to genetically modified foods and medicine was accurate and give noticely thought out. Readers are easily informed of what to expect as they compel with the field of operations findings. However, the title missed on the study area. A good ti tle must inform readers where the study is conducted. Abstract The researchers espouse non structure reverse. They were able to school principal out the background leading to the study, the settle of survey, research approaches they used trough the study and the findings.With regard to this they managed to give a brief overview of the research J is 2 and yet letting readers know what their study entailed and what they found out. A structured abstract would have been more desired as it enlists each of the study sections. However, depending with the journal requirements and authors interests they preferred non structured abstract to one that is structured. Purpose of the Study The investigators clearly pointed out the aim of the study. They assessed and compared the attitudes of the Malaysian stakeholders living in the Klang Valley towards genetically modified insulin, palm oil and soybeans.This was influenced by the findings from the other studies. For instance, other studies r evealed that the advancement in technology led to increased production of GM Foods. In addition, they found that biotechnology is one of the five major technologies that are planned to speed industrialization in Malaysia. However, owing to the divisive debate on genetically modified foods, the researchers proverb the need for this study. Therefore, it has clear cut intent of telling where Malaysians attitudes leans and what measures should be delegate in place to better their attitude.Research Approaches The investigators adopted a well defined research approach. They designed the study as a survey which was conducted from June, 2004 to February, 2005. The sample size was 107 respondents above 18 years. They were selected through stratification take in which enabled the generalization of the findings and minimized biased that could result from sample selection. In addition, they amass the data through administering questionnaire and ensured that reliability and validity of the s tudy are all accounted for.However, the researchers did not tell the readers how they met the ethical principles, especially principles of ethics of beneficence and Jones 3 justice. They didnt point out whether they consulted any ethical institution or whether they sought consent before recruiting the respondents. Results The study findings were reproducible with the objective. The findings centered on six dimensions of the stakeholders attitudes including moral concerns, perceived benefits, familiarity, encouragement, risk acceptance and perceived risks. From the findings it was clear that majority of the stakeholders were not familiar with the ternion GM products.It was more strike when the findings indicated that biology students were more familiar with the GM palm oil and GM soybeans than religious scholars. The findings further established that stakeholders are moderately concerned with the moral aspects of the GM products, moderately perceive the products as risky and moder ately perceive the GM products as beneficial. All the same they encouraged the use of the three products, with most stakeholders supportive of GM palm oil. These findings were consistent with the other studies. For instance, in China, study by Zhang et al.(19) indicated that consumers were not familiar with GM products yet domestic help consumption of GM soybeans was about 18% of the interviewees that were consuming soybeans. In addition, the findings were consistent with earlier studies by ISAAA-UIUC (14-15) which found that Asians accept GM foods but at the same acknowledge the risks they pose to health. Based on these consistencies, the study met the unfeelingness of trustworthiness, applicability and reliability. The conclusions were drawn from the study. The investigators concluded that the Malaysian stakeholders attitude on GM products was cautious.Indeed, this is in tandem with the findings that the stakeholders moderately perceive the GM products as twain beneficial and J ones 4 detrimental to health. In addition the implications of the study were report in the conclusion. They noted that the biotechnologists should assess the moral aspects, risks and benefits of the GM foods and thereafter engage the public on acceptance of the products before considering commercialization of the products. However, the researcher failed to point out the limitations of the study as well as the areas that need further research.Work CitedAmin, Latifah Jahi, Jamaluddin and Nor Abd. Stakeholders attitude to GM foods and medicine. The Scientific World Journal. 2013. Jones 5 multinational Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) and University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign (UIUC), The social and cultural dimensions of rustic biotechnology in Southeast Asia public understanding, perceptions, and attitudes towards biotechnology in Phillipines. ISAAA. Publications. Zhang, Xi Huang, Jin Qiu, Ha and Huang, Zheng. A consumer segmentation study with re gards to genetically modified food in urban China. Food Policy. 355. 2010.