De Tocqueville Essay -- essays research papers

Alexis De Tocqueville, Democracy in America noblesse is a phenomenon that is perhaps as natural a summer crop, and as devastating as the locusts that eat it. De Tocqueville&8217s position on grandeur is quite clear. He is a strong advocate of the aristocracy, it is a eccentric of the natural order and necessary. His position may scram some basis, tho I take a crap yet to represent the &8220upside of a caste establishment or a good defense of it.De Tocqueville believes that aristocracy provides stability and fellowship. De Tocqueville&8217s support of aristocracy is weak and ill founded. His first point of aristocracy is that of stability, &8220Among aristocratic nations, as families remain for centuries in the same condition,. Stationary families project the stability to resist most circumstances and become fixed. This also allows families to move in power that they have no real right to hold. Old things often become stagnant and rotten, as did the aristocracy when famili es intermarried beyond their genes capacity, as sanitary as becoming corrupted. De Tocqueville&8217s second point is that the aristocracy have great lineage and pay homage to their ancestors, &8220A man nearly always knows his forefathers and respects them. This is quite true, however De Tocqueville does not mention that because of the family &8220blood, wars have been fought, and many lives lost. De Tocqueville continues to say, &8220He willingly imposes duties on himself towards the former and latter ancestors and descendants, and he will frequently sacrifice his personal gratifications . . .. It is a nice sentiment, however, register has taught us that it is r be to find a self-sacrificing person, and even rarer is the kind over lord. De Tocqueville&8217s argument lacks a solid and provable basis. The point that aristocrats looking for only for their ancestors or descendants is a very self-centered act. They are concerned with only their family and it&8217s success. De Tocq ueville does not mention the &8220sacrifice an angry lord films for his serfs and servants by throwing them off his land. It would destroy De Tocqueville&8217s argument to show that lords were hard, if not cruel at times, on their tenets. History has proven it. &nb... ...o people flock live lives of their own. Equality is one of democracy&8217s worlds. De Tocqueville does not see this, however as he writes, &8220As social conditions become much equal . . . people cannot . . . exercise any great influence over their fellows,. The belief behind this strange equality is that people are free to make decisions with out the fear of outside influences. Democracy, though it works as a system designed for the masses, also works for individual rights. De Tocqueville notes that, &8220they are minded(predicate) to imagine that their whole destiny is in their own hands.. This is a foundation of democracy, that we have right to life. This includes the right to shape our &8220destiny. De To cqueville wrote sensible arguments, save the fact that they were totally unfounded and not supported in any way. I cannot say whether it is better live under democracy or feudalism. It is mathematical to see that in most circumstances, a democracy is better for the people. In fact, it&8217s better for any person to live under a democracy, except for the aristocrat.