Ethical Theories Essay

Moral dilemmas be a give away of daily life and the solutions presented to them are ordinarily dependent on the morals that govern the soul facing them. Every psyche at one put in time has been mettled with a honourable dilemma. This set up be described as the value which are used to memorize the the right way way to handle a situation and the legal injury way to go around it. Each society and companionship has its own righteous index and in round societies, an deed may be viewed tolerable or right, while the alike action in another friendship would be viewed as intolerable and frowned upon.The moral index of a society unremarkably goes hand in hand with sacred beliefs and communities which are religiously inclined to entertain strict rules on what is suitable deportment and what is not. Societies which generate more secular values mutu every(prenominal)y tolerate extreme or eccentric behavior. The difference in opinions of several(predicate) pile in what is normally right and wrong has led to the development of non-homogeneous impartial theories. Two of these theories are utilitarianism and debt instrument ethics. An example of a situation which brought about different ethical affirm panes is the Firestone go with tire think back in 1999 and 2000.The conjunction had discovered that its newly designed firestorm stellate ATX, ATX II and Wilderness AT tires were unsound back in 1996, after(prenominal) 8 of the 18 times were singled out after they failed a test that tested the fortitude of tires under high speed. Of the 14. 4 jillion tires sold approximately 6. 5 one thousand thousand tires had to be recalled due to defects in the lucubrate which intricate the tread and one mark blame separating from the other steel belt and carcass The details has led to full and even fatal accidents as the cars retrousse when the accidents occurred while they were in motion.In an sample to show difference between utilitarianism and indebtedness ethics we shall consider an take on the job(p) for the follow at the time and the conduct he or she would take if they bid to utilitarianism or duty ethics Utilitarianism can be described as an ethical theory that proposes that the action that earns good or favorable consequences to the majority is not field of battle to whether it is right or wrong significance it is not subject to questioning. (Fredrick,2003) This theory was greatly championed by utilitarians such as gutter Stuart Mill.This theory advocates for actions that produce happiness to the greatest or largest number of people. In an deification situation this may be accomplishable notwithstanding usually any(prenominal) action can produce happiness to umpteen or a few people depending on the action. The theory does not usually advocate for the use of ethically coif actions at all times and consequently actions which may be viewed as wrong sometimes bring happiness to a large group of peop le but the actions still remain morally wrong. An manoeuver subscribing to the utilitarianism way to life would fuck off support the party stand and the action it took.The company discovered that some tires were defective and did not recall the rest of the tires that had already been sold. This hint to accidents which caused suffering and death and it was not until an investigating into the cause of the accidents that finally forced the Firestone troupe to admit liability and recall the tires. The company did not recall the tires because it feared the losses that it would face incase the tires were all defective. The company chose to nourish their profits margins at the expense of their clients. (Little, 2003)As an engineer with a utilitarianism view point this action would be the best because recalling would mean value great losses and downsizing in terms of job which would mean unemployment for umpteen people working(a) at the company affecting both them and their dependan ts. The duty ethics proposes that the action taken in any situation should be just and honest and respectful to all persons involved. This ethical linguistic rule advances for the upholding of principles regardless to the wrong consequences whether they will be good or bad. (Graham,2004)An engineer working for the Firestone Company would have chosen to recall all the defective tires and conducted a through investigation to the causes of the defaults without external pressure or the threat of law suits as inducement. The engineer moral compass would have manoeuvre them to make such a stand regardless to the fallout which is this case would have resulted in major losses to the company. As per the requirements of the engineering profession, this mechanical engineer was ascribed to some basic fundamental ethics and the pertinent professional codes of conduct while in the jurisdiction of their duty.These are guidelines aimed at providing precaution standards for the engineers while at work and the common good of the society. However, the same was objectively pitiable in the Firestones case. As a basic requirement, they should exercise their professional skills and excessively knowledge in providing contentment in the general human life. Impartiality and veracity should prevail in their service where faithfulness to the public should never be compromised higher up that of clients and also employers. Elsewhere, engineers should pursue a continue development in their profession and bring service to their different clients without any conflict.These are the basic fundamentals of mechanical engineers whose increase is provided by the support of the canons of mechanical engineering. In conclusion the moral stand point taken by any individual should always be after requiring all the necessary information. This is because in every ratiocination made, there are always individuals who issue and those who benefit. As in the Firestone, the recalling ending would h ave resulted in loss. After careful evaluation one should decide on the decision that brings minimal losses in the involved activity.