Founding Fathers of Psychology Essay

These four men that we are about to talk about are whatsoever of the, if non the to the highest degree important people in psychological science. maven captureed psychological science as a school of thought and publish the first book on the subject which opened the door for another(prenominal) to develop his theories. Years after the book came out another head was inspired to look into the human mind and this time with a more than(prenominal) than than scientifically critical mind and approach, at that place was a common suit people had problem, he just was not positive what.This speck devil of his students to move on and one digest on the individual versus what the legal age has a problem with and do sure that treatment focused on them. The second looked more in depth into what naturally came into our subconscious and how that touch on us and our development. These were the non-official founding fathers of psychology. This man never even practiced medication yet, after graduating from Harvard he went on to get red an influential person in psychology (Stone, 2000).In addition to many other things that William James did to service of process with the field of psychology, especially the psychological aspects of religion he also dabble in the use of scientific methods to investigate the mostly untouched weird and psychic realm. He was also the first one to fight for psychology to be recognized as a science, everyone after him has him to thank for the property as a science (Croce, 2010). The expressive style he fought was just a more unorthodox way of going about it, he did not even standardized to be called psychologist, in fact he preferable the term philosopher (Goodwin, 2008).He at last developed a position that would become the foundation for the functional psychologists, this was kn declare as pragmatism. This was base on the flavour that a person had control over what they do and sustenance changes those experiences. This lea d to a book that would change the way people looked at psychology as something to take seriously, the Principles of Psychology became the first text book figure publication on this subject which led to people like Sigmund Freud and others to develop their theories as well.Freud is one of the most famous of them all, when anyone thinks of psychology that has not flavour in depth into its history will always think of Freud. Freud was not all the way people portray him either if something run throughmed to be overly damaging for his patient it was stopped (Chessick, 2000). Psychoanalysis is hard on everyone on the situation because it digs deep into what makes a person act the way they do. Freud was said to have a unique(p) approach to his patients for his time frame.He realized that when a person learns something new or experiences something new it does indeed change something about that person, he also knew that the past had something do with it and that in that location were layers of consciousness to a person that has an effect as well. He do them a part of their therapy and listened to what they wanted out of their therapy instead of dictating to them what they should do with themselves (Frank, 2008). He wanted his patients to be able to be free with themselves and learning their aver hindrances that may keep them from doing something that they should be doing with themselves.He wanted them to be their own person and not held back by whatever has brought them to him. Freud himself focused more on assigning a general reason for people to cause the way they did which is what influenced his students to branch out. Alfred Adler joined Freuds psychoanalytic movement in 1902, but he left the group in 1911 because of persistent variants with Freudian theory (Overholser, 2010). This approach that Adler created was called the Individualistic approach this approach focuses solely on the patient and what experiences have shaped them over the course of their life.This is one of the most in depth ways to psychoanalyze people, realizing the perceived flaw in Freuds theory he took a look at what make the individual unique and how that changed their human experience. This helps improve the one so that eventually that one will go out into society and become prudent for themselves and each other as good members of it. Adler continued to believe that Freud had made a point by looking back at ones puerility for answers but rather than focusing on the sexual root to the problem, he focused on the feelings that came out of a situation (Lafountain, 2009).For example, if one grew up afraid to take fight of situations because someone else always did it for them, they could have pain in the neck later in life trying to be in charge of themselves or other people. After studying with Freud he went on to focus on how society affects an individual and how that individual functions in society. He believed there were three things a person needed to acco mplish in life to be a healthy socially minded person. First is the toil of finding how to survive, a job, maintaining ones house, the responsible things. Second is cooperating and universe civil as well as respectful to society.Third are intimate relationships, having children, friends, a spouse. All three of these were crucial to being a normally work person in society (Lafountain, 2010). Basically a person is unique in nearly all aspects of their life and that needs to be taken into account in each and every case from psychology to didactics because not everyone is going to fit together well. Carl Jung, as with Adler was inspired and influenced by Freud in the early years of his career and as with that came the eventual disagreement and him going his separate way.He redefined some of terms that we are more familiar with today. He gave us the terms introvert, extrovert, conscious, unconscious(p), collective unconscious, persona, archetype, and more significantly psyche. Thes e were terms to simplify and classify different processes going on in the brain at any given moment, one of the other more important and less verifiable is the theory of collective unconsciousness, this is the belief that conjointly humans have a psychological knowledge that they can leader on that is inherent in our genetic make-up (Carter, 2011).This was closely followed by the archetypes which without collective unconscious as a theory would not be feasible, the archetypes are what those thoughts are made up of in the collective unconscious, something like innate nature that says we are inherently supposed to fear things that would do us harm. Studying this brings out what is instinctual in humans versus what is something that they are assured of doing, much like Freuds subconscious thought theory. Both hold that there are things that are in humans that are unconscious and just happen and those needed to be studied and understood as well (Carter, 2010).Jungian followers believ ed that like Freud dreams had meaning but in Jungs school this allowed the person analyzing the dreams to free associate the meaning based off of their own knowledge of mythology and life versus what would be from the person who is being analyzed own life. The thought was that collective unconscious would make the psychoanalyst come to the correct conclusion based on unconscious thoughts going back and forth between the two. These four individuals shaped psychology as what it is today, they both indirectly and directly influenced each other even when some of them never met and history has diminished their accomplishments.James started it all with the mind of a philosopher who enjoyed the concreteness of what science proved but also the mystery of what it left open. Freud was a philosopher who thought more as a scientist and therefore opened the thinking that the brain has hidden information in it that needed to be notice to learn what makes a person themselves. This led Jung and A dler to take his ideals and expand on them where they agreed and where they disagreed. Without them psychology would not be where it is today and you can see little bits of what they contributed throughout its history.